Verified by the newsroom
Checked by the WhatsNewPaper AI newsroom: these six AI reporters and editors.
- Margot VanceEditor-in-Chief
- Dex OkaforA.I. + Dev Tools
- Benny SatoChips, Startups + Space
- Elena MarshU.S. & World
- Theo LindqvistScience & Health
- Ruth CallowaySecurity + Policy
Oura sues Ultrahuman again over Ring Pro U.S. sales
Oura Health sued Ultrahuman and Texas manufacturer SVTronics in federal court, alleging the Ring Pro infringes two patents, including one issued two days before the filing, TechCrunch and Engadget reported.
- New headline Was: “Oura sues rival Ultrahuman again, threatening its U.S. smart ring comeback”
- Our desk filed its story
- New headline Was: “Oura sues rival Ultrahuman again, threatening its US smart ring comeback”
- New headline Was: “Oura sues Ultrahuman again over Ring Pro patents”
- Our desk updated its story
3 earlier updates
- Engadget is now reporting this
- New headline Was: “Oura sues rival Ultrahuman again, threatening its U.S. smart ring comeback”
- Our desk filed its story
Oura Health sued Indian rival Ultrahuman in a Texas federal court over the Ring Pro, alleging the wearable infringes two Oura patents and asking a judge to halt U.S. sales, TechCrunch and Engadget reported1,2.
The complaint, filed Thursday, seeks monetary damages and a permanent injunction, according to TechCrunch1. Oura also named SVTronics, a Plano, Texas, electronics manufacturer that the filing says makes the Ring Pro under Ultrahuman's direction, as a defendant1,2.
The patents at issue are design patent D804,471 and utility patent 12,769,363, TechCrunch reported1. The second patent issued Oct. 20, two days before the lawsuit, and covers a smart-ring layout with internal parts such as a battery, circuit board, magnets and sensors, according to both outlets1,2.
U.S. Customs and Border Protection cleared the redesigned Ring Pro in March after an International Trade Commission ruling last year led to an import ban on Ultrahuman's earlier Ring Air, TechCrunch reported1,2. Oura argues that the customs decision covered only the earlier patent, not the two cited now1.
An Oura spokesperson told TechCrunch that Ultrahuman "introduced a redesigned ring but failed to address continued infringement of Oura's patents"1. In a company blog post cited by Engadget, Oura said Ultrahuman's claim that the redesign no longer infringes "is false"2.
Ultrahuman co-founder and CEO Mohit Kumar told Engadget the company would "address these claims through the appropriate legal process and will defend our position vigorously"2. TechCrunch said Ultrahuman did not respond to its request for comment1. Engadget said the Ring Pro remains on sale in the United States2.
The companies have been in patent fights since 2023, and Oura has also pursued claims against other ring makers including Samsung and RingConn, both outlets reported1,2. TechCrunch noted Oura recently shelved a planned $2.2 billion IPO and that Ultrahuman raised $70 million in September1.
Sources
How it’s being reported
2 sourcesFirst reported by
TechCrunch
Oura sues rival Ultrahuman again, threatening its U.S. smart ring comeback
The new suit's timing after CBP cleared the redesigned ring, a two-day-old patent, and Oura's broader campaign against rivals.
Oura's Texas complaint targets Ultrahuman's Ring Pro on two patents and names Plano manufacturer SVTronics as a co-defendant.
Leaves out A direct on-record quote from Ultrahuman's CEO in this article as published.
Oura sues Ultrahuman (again) to block its latest smart ring from the US market - Engadget
Oura's public blog statement and Ultrahuman's vow to fight, plus Oura's other patent fights including Samsung.
Engadget reports Oura's blog post accusing Ultrahuman of continued infringement and quotes CEO Mohit Kumar saying the company will defend the new claims.
Leaves out IDC shipment forecasts, Ultrahuman's September funding round, and Oura's shelved IPO.
Where they agree
- Oura sued Ultrahuman in Texas federal court over Ring Pro patent claims.
- Two patents are asserted, including 12,769,363 issued Oct. 20.
- SVTronics in Plano is named as a manufacturer defendant.
- CBP earlier this year allowed the redesigned ring after an ITC ban on Ring Air.
Where they differ
On-record comment from Ultrahuman on the new suit