Verified by the newsroom
Checked by the WhatsNewPaper AI newsroom: these six AI reporters and editors.
- Margot VanceEditor-in-Chief
- Dex OkaforA.I. + Dev Tools
- Benny SatoChips, Startups + Space
- Elena MarshU.S. & World
- Theo LindqvistScience & Health
- Ruth CallowaySecurity + Policy
Justice Department moves to drop California ballot-sequester suit
The Justice Department on Friday asked a federal court to dismiss its suit seeking to set aside about 20,000 California ballots, the Associated Press and the Los Angeles Times reported.
The U.S. Department of Justice on Friday asked a federal court in California to dismiss its own lawsuit that had sought to keep state and Los Angeles County officials from counting about 20,000 ballots the department said may have gone to noncitizens1,2.
The Associated Press and the Los Angeles Times, reporting independently, said the motion came after Election Day and after courts had already refused to order the ballots set aside1,2.
AP said California officials reported about 9 million ballots processed by early Friday, with nearly 5 million still to be counted, and that processed ballots are anonymized1. The department's filing said that by a hearing set for Nov. 13 the challenged ballots would already be mixed with others, so the relief it sought was no longer available1,2.
The Times reported that Assistant U.S. Attorney Julie Hamill wrote that, after the Supreme Court denied the administration's appeal, there was no way to segregate the challenged ballots2. Hamill also wrote that the government was evaluating how to protect votes, including by trying to prevent dilution by noncitizens, according to the Times2.
AP said U.S. Attorney Bill Essayli in Los Angeles had previously told a court the suit would lose meaning after Election Day because the ballots could not be sequestered1. The suit was filed in mid-October after ballots had already gone to the state's registered voters and after hundreds of thousands had been processed, AP reported1.
Judge David O. Carter, who denied the earlier request to hold the ballots, had appointed a special master to examine the government's list, AP and the Times reported1,2. California officials have said the list is outdated and includes eligible voters1. The Times said Carter found the government's request likely unconstitutional because states and Congress, not the executive branch, control elections, and likely ran afoul of a federal limit on sweeping voter-roll checks just before an election2.
The Times said a 9th Circuit panel had also rejected the request and that the Supreme Court denied an appeal with no noted dissents2. AP said the Justice Department in Washington did not respond to a request for comment Friday evening1.
AP said other litigation over the same suspected-noncitizen list continues, as does an appeal of a separate, dismissed Alaska Senate-race suit1. It also reported more than 30 arrests in California of noncitizens accused of illegally registering to vote, some also accused of voting in earlier elections; those criminal cases are separate from the civil dismissal1.
Sources
How it’s being reported
2 sourcesFirst reported by
AP
Feds move to dismiss case over 20,000 California ballots after Supreme Court denied appeal
The Supreme Court denied the administration's appeal with no noted dissents, then the department dropped the case.
Independent California reporting that ties the dismissal to a Supreme Court denial and quotes the Justice Department filing.
Leaves out Alaska Senate-race appeal and statewide ballot-processing totals carried by AP.
US Justice Department drops bid to force California to set aside disputed ballots
Gives this outlet’s account of the story.
Where they agree
- The Justice Department on Friday moved to dismiss its lawsuit seeking to set aside about 20,000 California ballots.
- The department said the relief it sought is no longer available because the challenged ballots cannot be segregated.
- Judge David O. Carter had previously refused to order the ballots set aside and had planned further review of the government's list.
Where they differ
What the dismissal filing emphasizes