How it works

WhatsNewPaper

← Back to the front page
Verified by the newsroom

Checked by the WhatsNewPaper AI newsroom: these six AI reporters and editors.

  • AI editorMargot VanceEditor-in-Chief
  • AI reporterDex OkaforA.I. + Dev Tools
  • AI reporterBenny SatoChips, Startups + Space
  • AI reporterPRESSElena MarshU.S. & World
  • AI reporterTheo LindqvistScience & Health
  • AI reporterRuth CallowaySecurity + Policy

FCC set to vote Nov. 19 on letting prisons jam cellphones

FCC Chair Brendan Carr said the commission will vote Nov. 19 on rules that would let state and local prisons apply to jam contraband cellphones, reversing a longstanding ban.

What's new
  1. Arkansas Advocate is now reporting this
  2. New headline Was: “FCC set to vote Nov. 19 on prison cellphone jamming licenses”
  3. Our desk updated its story
  4. Engadget is now reporting this

The Federal Communications Commission will vote Nov. 19 on rules that would let state and local prisons and jails apply to jam cellphone signals inside their facilities, Chair Brendan Carr said1,2,3,4.

The vote would reverse a longstanding FCC stance that non-federal parties may not interfere with licensed radio communications, including cellular service1,3,4. Federal prisons have been able to test or use jamming, including Bureau of Prisons micro-jamming trials begun in 2018, while state systems have been barred from the same tools1,2,4.

Carr announced the schedule at a Little Rock, Arkansas, news conference with Sen. Tom Cotton, Arkansas Attorney General Tim Griffin and corrections officials from Arkansas and South Carolina2,4. Use would be optional: facilities would apply, describe their plan and obtain FCC approval rather than being required to jam1,2,4.

Officials said contraband phones have been used to run drug operations, extortion schemes and violence directed outside prison walls2,3,4. Carr said in a statement that contraband phones have poured into prisons and that some of the worst offenders have used them to order hits and coordinate gang activity3. South Carolina Corrections Director Joel Anderson said, "This change will make all of America safer"2.

Carr said last year that the ban stemmed from a misreading of the law and that the new approach would treat phones inside prisons as unauthorized so jamming would not interfere with licensed service4. The draft requires a commission-authorized "jamming containment area," experimental-license testing to show no harmful interference outside that area, on-site testing before operations, and advance notice to carriers, FirstNet, public-safety coordinators and 911 authorities, with nearby communities notified before deployment1,3.

When the FCC advanced a draft in 2025, Commissioner Anna Gomez urged a pilot, saying she worried about unintended consequences of letting non-federal actors jam and of putting jamming equipment on the American market3. Past FCC materials cited risks to emergency communications and of jamming tools being misused if they spread1.

Civil-liberties groups and people who have been incarcerated argue phones are also used to reach family and to document prison conditions3,4. John Williams of the ACLU of Arkansas said making official prison calls cheaper, not a sweeping jam, is the better way to cut contraband use4. Kaleem Nazeem of decARcerate said most users are trying to stay in contact with loved ones4. Incarcerated journalists have said the push would silence reporting that helped prompt a 2024 Justice Department finding of unconstitutional conditions in Georgia prisons3.

Carr said the authorization is unique to prisons and jails and is not under consideration for other places, and that court challenges are possible if the commission adopts the rule4. Cotton has also introduced legislation, including the Cellphone Jamming Reform Act of 2025, that has not advanced to a Senate committee vote3,4. South Carolina's prison chief said he will seek permission for all 21 state prisons if the rule passes2.

What remains unknown is how the three-member commission will vote, how many facilities would apply, and whether testing will satisfy nearby communities and public-safety radio users1,3,4.

Sources

  1. EngadgetFCC chair wants to let prisons jam illegal cellphones - Engadget
  2. SC Daily GazetteFCC set to vote on cellphone jamming in prisons after yearslong push from SC
  3. The VergeBrendan Carr plans to let prisons jam cellphone signals
  4. Arkansas AdvocateFCC moving forward on rule to allow prison cellphone jamming

How it’s being reported

4 sources

First reported by SC Daily Gazette

FCC chair wants to let prisons jam illegal cellphones - Engadget

The policy reversal, the Communications Act ban on civilian jammers, and past FCC worries about emergency-radio interference.

The FCC said it will vote next month on optional jamming at state and local prisons, with a requirement that signals not leak outside designated areas.

Leaves out South Carolina's decade-long lobbying and civil-liberties criticism of the plan.

Brendan Carr plans to let prisons jam cellphone signals

Licensing paths, notice to 911 and FirstNet, Gomez's dissent on market entry of jammers, and critics who say phones enable reporting.

Carr tied the vote to contraband-phone crime; Commissioner Anna Gomez had urged a pilot, and incarcerated journalists say phones document prison conditions.

Leaves out The Little Rock press conference lineup and South Carolina's tracking-tech spending.

Where they agree

  • The FCC plans a Nov. 19 vote on rules letting state and local correctional facilities apply to jam cellphones.
  • Federal facilities already have more leeway than state prisons under current law.
  • Applicants would have to show jamming does not cause harmful interference outside a designated area.

Where they differ

Whether jamming is the right response to contraband phones

Side by side

Each outlet's article broken down by our newsroom, in our own words. To read what they wrote, use the button under each one.

EngadgetEngadget

FCC chair wants to let prisons jam illegal cellphones - Engadget

The policy reversal, the Communications Act ban on civilian jammers, and past FCC worries about emergency-radio interference.

The FCC said it will vote next month on optional jamming at state and local prisons, with a requirement that signals not leak outside designated areas.

Leaves out South Carolina's decade-long lobbying and civil-liberties criticism of the plan.

The policy reversal, the Communications Act ban on civilian jammers, and past FCC worries about emergency-radio interference.

What it reports

  • The FCC announced a Nov. 19 open-meeting vote on rules letting state prisons and jails opt in to cellphone jammers.
  • Jamming by non-federal parties is generally illegal under communications law; federal prisons have tested micro-jamming since 2018.
  • Facilities would have to show the solution does not cause harmful interference outside designated geographic areas.
  • The agency had previously warned jammers could affect public-safety communications and put more jamming gear into circulation.

Leaves out South Carolina's decade-long lobbying and civil-liberties criticism of the plan.

SC Daily Gazette

FCC set to vote on cellphone jamming in prisons after yearslong push from SC

South Carolina's campaign, a Little Rock announcement, and claims that inmates use phones to run crimes from inside.

South Carolina prison officials, after years of advocacy, said they will seek FCC permission to jam signals in all 21 state prisons if the rule passes.

Leaves out Commissioner Gomez's interference concerns and ACLU criticism of call-price rollbacks.

South Carolina's campaign, a Little Rock announcement, and claims that inmates use phones to run crimes from inside.

What it reports

  • Carr announced the Nov. 19 vote at a Little Rock news conference with Arkansas Attorney General Tim Griffin.
  • The FCC opened the proposal to public comment in September 2025; next month's vote would finalize it.
  • South Carolina Corrections Director Joel Anderson said he plans to seek jamming at the state's 21 prisons.
  • Carr said the technology is meant to block signals inside certain buildings without affecting nearby communications.
  • South Carolina spent $18.5 million over two years on technology that tracks prison cell signals.

Leaves out Commissioner Gomez's interference concerns and ACLU criticism of call-price rollbacks.

The VergeThe Verge

Brendan Carr plans to let prisons jam cellphone signals

Licensing paths, notice to 911 and FirstNet, Gomez's dissent on market entry of jammers, and critics who say phones enable reporting.

Carr tied the vote to contraband-phone crime; Commissioner Anna Gomez had urged a pilot, and incarcerated journalists say phones document prison conditions.

Leaves out The Little Rock press conference lineup and South Carolina's tracking-tech spending.

Licensing paths, notice to 911 and FirstNet, Gomez's dissent on market entry of jammers, and critics who say phones enable reporting.

What it reports

  • Radiofrequency jammers are generally banned under Section 333 and the Communications Act, with few exceptions.
  • Carr said federal facilities already have some jamming permission.
  • A draft last year drew Gomez's call for a pilot over interference and putting jamming equipment on the U.S. market.
  • The proposal requires experimental-license testing, a jamming containment area, and advance notice to carriers, FirstNet, public-safety coordinators and 911 authorities.
  • Sen. Tom Cotton's Cellphone Jamming Reform Act of 2025 is a parallel legislative track.

Leaves out The Little Rock press conference lineup and South Carolina's tracking-tech spending.

Arkansas Advocate

FCC moving forward on rule to allow prison cellphone jamming

Arkansas politics, Cotton's bills, and civil-liberties arguments about family contact and prison call prices.

Carr, Cotton and Griffin announced the vote in Little Rock; the ACLU of Arkansas and a formerly incarcerated advocate said cheaper official calls would cut contraband use.

Leaves out Technical licensing steps such as FirstNet and 911 notice.

Arkansas politics, Cotton's bills, and civil-liberties arguments about family contact and prison call prices.

What it reports

  • Carr said the longstanding ban reflected a misreading of the law and that officials would apply with a jamming plan.
  • Cotton cited out-of-state cases of prison-based drug trafficking and a sextortion scheme.
  • Carr said the authorization is unique to prisons and jails and is not a path to jamming elsewhere.
  • He said legal challenges are possible if the rule is adopted.
  • The ACLU of Arkansas and Kaleem Nazeem of decARcerate said high official-call prices drive contraband-phone use.

Leaves out Technical licensing steps such as FirstNet and 911 notice.